From a social perspective, the blog post "Brand Malala": Western Exploitation of a Schoolgirl shows some of western society’s double standards in action. For example,
Taliban terrorism and US state terrorism are not viewed as equally terrible
actions, although both are still ‘terrorism.’ The media reports the former to
“propel the ‘good west versus bad east’ narrative” and reports the later as
“collateral damage” (Grayson 594).
The author shows her emotional viewpoint
through the skeptical and condescending tone she presents the text in. She quotes
words such as “alliance” and “rescuing” (Grayson 594) to show she is
unconvinced of the truth these words should present. Grayson also continually
uses business lingo such as “commodification” and “consumption” (595) when
describing Malala’s situation to further her point that Malala is being
exploited as an object of profit.
In relation to rhetoric, the author
presents her argumentative speech in a personal opinionated manner. As the text
is written to post on a blog it is written more informally and more biased than
a newspaper article would be on the same subject. Many of Grayson’s statements
are opinions, ranging from “I am not even sure” (594) to “I doubt” (593) and “I
would think” (598). She also asks the
readers rhetorical questions instead of providing the answers to these
questions, letting the readers connect to the text more personally.
Grayson’s
logical process in this text tends to be inductive rather than deductive. The
argument that Malala is being exploited and used as a distraction from other
women is proven with assumptions. For example, the author induces that Malala
is being marketed for exploitation from the fact that she is managed by a PR
company (Grayson 596). In addition, Grayson infers what Malala wants (598), even
though she has never met nor quoted anything Malala has said.
Ethically
the text maintains that it is wrong for society and politicians to take up one
case of “injustice” and ignore the rest. The author calls upon the
responsibility of society to treat all victims of what she sees as
injustice fairly, whether they are victims of drone strikes or inequality
towards women. In addition, Grayson also feels it is society’s responsibility
to denounce the use of violence, and in the text states, “All violence must be
condemned” (594).
Works Cited
Grayson, Carol Anne. ""Brand
Malala": Western Exploitation of a Schoolgirl." Shifting Narratives: A Reader for Academic Writing. 1st
Ed. Sinno, Z. S., Bioghlu-Karkanawi, L., Fleszar, D., Jarkas, N., Moughabghab,
E., Nish, J. M., . . . Ward, A. Beirut: Educart, 2015. 593-598. Print.
social: good quoting and citing. Use the full name of editors in work cited and indent second and third lines
ReplyDeleteemotional: good
rhetorical:justify, why does she do this?
logical: weak, what are her arguments
ethical: good