Noura Al
Bistami
Ms. Dania Adra
English 203
Ms. Dania Adra
English 203
October 10, 2015
A Dull Gray
From the beginning of human
civilization, people have been put under the umbrella of ‘class’. The top class
assumes most power and wealth, whereas the bottom class resides below human
conditions. The question at hand is, is this fair? Is there a way to rule
people without having a black or white world of rich vs. poor? This wheels in
the question of freedom – are we as free as we think we are? The mind on its
own has its liberty to cross boundaries, however our actions are indeed
limited. Jean- Jacques Rousseau has tackled this problem in his most famous
work “The Social Contract”, published in the 18th century. Although
he discusses it in terms of the French Revolution, it applies for the world
today. This shows how time does not truly impact human behavior, and it is
almost disappointing to note.
Rousseau tackles key subjects that
feed into answering the questions above, and he does so through his own voice
and opinion, and not by merely stating facts. He emphasizes action over
thought/voice, and does so by setting himself as an example, “I wouldn’t waste
my time saying what should be done; I would do it, or keep quiet” (Rousseau
114). This shows a rather disappointing tone towards people who are indeed in
charge and in legible positions who are merely speaking rather than acting, and
he criticizes them immensely. He also mentions the idea of liberty. “Man is
born free, and everywhere he is in chains” (Rousseau 114), is a rather
prominent quote due to its irony. However, I don’t believe that man is born
free at all. Man is born into his society, into his social hub, and into his
social class nonetheless. A man is born free in terms of responsibilities,
however, which could tie into his use of the word “chains” (although he indeed
meant slavery on different levels). He mentions how people in charge assume
they are free, only to realize that there is a stronger power above. I believe
that the minute power is abused, regardless of its degree, the situation
resulted is in fact catastrophic, however the time needed to reach that
catastrophe. The abuse of power is evident in almost every country in our world
today, and has been a key subject in politics since the very beginning of politics
anyway. I was born into a country so broken its government doesn’t even exist…
thus I am well aware of corruption. Not only do I see it, but I breathe it,
live it, and quite angrily, I endure it. Rousseau also mentions instinct vs.
moral, and how our actions have changed immensely due to our shift from
instinctual thoughts to “the voice of duty” (Rousseau 114). I liked the end
where it shows how life is indeed gray, because he mentions how you are always
one step front and back simultaneously. This brings in the topic of possession,
and how we assume possession of everything we own is a ‘benefit’ of the social
contract (Rousseau 115), as he bluntly put it. The idea of possession in itself
perplexes me; do we actually possess anything? We don’t even posses our own
bodies—they are controlled by medications, foods, water, and so on… all of
which are controlled by the government and others. Our bodies are influenced
heavily on the inside. What about the exterior? We ‘possess’ our own identity,
but we are not allowed to look a certain way? Do we really own anything other
than our own thoughts? (Do we even own that too??)
I chose this picture to relate to
the text for two reasons: Firstly, it’s gray. Secondly, it shows just how
inconsiderate a person may be in terms of what they ‘possess’. I parked my car
sensibly in the vast parking lot of Zaytuna Bay, where numerous empty slots
were open. It was about 4:30 PM in the summer, and this area begins to crowd
immensely by roughly 6:00 PM. I was so taken back by this strange human being
that I decided to photograph it and send it to my friends, mocking this
person’s idiocy quite honestly. This shows how man assumes he has the freedom
to choose where to park regardless of any other person who may need the space.
This ‘freedom’ is greed, it is nonsense, and mostly, it is truly dumb. I see no
point in parking this way whatsoever, and I still wonder what this person was
feeling upon deciding to be this selfish. This picture supports the main idea
of liberty as well as social class. Perhaps this person is of a higher class
and assumes he/she has power over others due to their position? Perhaps this
person chose instinct over morals when they decided right then and there that
no one would need the parking space? Or perhaps, they assumed they had the
freedom to park wherever due to the three separate
parking spaces?? Regardless, I see this picture as an extension of many
topics discussed above, including living in a country so broken, the people
themselves are beginning to lose it.
Works Cited:
Rousseau,
Jean-Jacques. "The Social Contract." Shifting Narratives.
Ed. Zane Sinno, Lina Bioghlu-Karkanawi, Dorota Fleszar, Najla Jarkas, Emma
Moughabghab, Jennifer Nish, Rima Rantisi, and Abir Ward. 1st ed. Beirut:
Educart, 2015. 113-15. Print.
moodle
ReplyDelete